Table 9.

Categorizing design features by medium self-efficacy participants (n=32).

Design features	Frequency of design feature							Category strength (%)		Total strength (%)		Classification results
	A	M	O	I	R	Q
A15	3	12	4	12	0	1	0		59		M
A22	7	12	5	8	0	0	13		75		M
A23	6	10	4	10	2	0	0		63		X(M,I)a
A25	6	13	3	10	0	0	9		69		M
A26	4	13	3	12	0	0	3		63		X(M,I)a
A52	7	12	3	10	0	0	6		69		M

^aX(C₁, C₂) indicates that a design feature had close proportions in two categories of C₁ and C₂.