Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 8;12:94. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0832-x

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

(a1-a3) Variation of the ITVWEPL COM relative to the CTV in the longitudinal (a1), lateral (a2) and superior-inferior (a3) direction with respect to beam’s-eye-view. b1) HD95% as function of the beam geometry, with each box showing 25-75% of the data. b2) Correlation, per beam direction, between the CTV mean dose for the weekly CTs (plan optimized to the ITVG0) and the HD95