Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 3.
Published in final edited form as: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2017 Feb 3;43(3-4):128–143. doi: 10.1159/000456541

Table 5.

Regions of interest (ROIs) by neuropathology type associated with gait in reviewed papers

ROI WM GM Neuronal activity Tau Total
Frontal lobe xxx xxxxxxx xx 12
Parietal lobe xxxxx xx x 8
Temporal lobe x xxxx x x 7
Cerebellum xxxx xx 6
Cingulate xx xx x 5
Motor cortex xx xxx 5
Somatosensory cortex xxx xx 5
Hippocampus xxx x 4
Occipital lobe x xx x 4
Caudate x x 2
Corpus callosum xxx 3
Insula xxx 3
Putamen xx x 3
Fusiform gyrus x x 2
Parahippocampal gyrus x x 2
Precuneus x x 2
Thalamus x x 2
Cingulum x 1
Corona radiata x 1
Lingual gyrus x 1
Pallidum x 1
Substantia nigra x 1

Total by pathology type 17 41 18 7 2

WM, white matter; GM, grey matter, Aβ, amyloid beta protein

It should be noted that Buchman and colleagues (2008; 2013) [66, 67] investigated the association between AD pathology (neuritic plaques, diffuse plaques, and neurofibrillary tangles) averaged across midfrontal, superiortemporal, inferior parietal, entorhinal, and hippocampal ROIs and gait, so it was not possible to differentiate by ROI or pathology type in these instances.