Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 15;81(12):1014–1022. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.12.010

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Propensity to gamble and model simulations. (A) The proportion of trials in which the gamble was chosen was calculated for each participant and each gamble type (mixed, gain only), then averaged separately for anxious and control groups (solid-filled bars). Model simulations were calculated in a similar way using each participant’s parameter estimates to calculate the utility difference between the gamble and the sure option on each trial, resulting in a simulated gamble choice if that estimated utility difference was positive and a simulated safe choice if it was negative. These simulated propensities to gamble were also calculated separately for each gamble type and averaged separately for anxious and control groups (grid-filled bars). Error bars represent SEM. *p < .05 (two-tailed t test). (B, C) Sensitivity plots depicting how well the modeled (or simulated) data correlated with the actual data, plotted separately for mixed gamble trials (B) and gain-only gamble trials (C). Each data point represents an individual participant.