Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Mar 6;29(7):10.1111/nmo.13044. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13044

Table 1.

Diagnostic Accuracy According to Variable Cut-off Values for Rectal Gas Volume and Rectal Gas Maximum Area CT Images for Predicting Rectal Evacuation Disorders

Cut-off value Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV OR (95% CI)
RGV>50mL 17.5% 96.4% 84.6% 50.5% 5.6 (1.2~26.5)
RGV>40mL 20.6% 92.7% 76.5% 50.5% 3.3 (1.0~10.9)
RGV>30mL 27.0% 90.9% 77.3% 52.8% 3.7 (1.3~10.8)
RGV>20mL 38.1% 89.1% 80.0% 55.7% 5.0 (1.9~13.5)
RGV>10mL 54.0% 76.4% 72.3% 59.2% 3.8 (1.7~8.4)
MRGTA>15cm2 15.9% 94.6% 76.9% 79.5% 3.3 (0.9~12.6)
MRGTA>10cm2 24.6% 90.9% 75.0% 52.1% 3.1 (1.1~9.3)
MRGTA>5cm2 54.0% 80.0% 76.6% 60.3% 4.7 (2.1~10.7)
RGA on scout>8cm2 20.6% 59.1% 68.4% 49.5% 2.1 (0.75~6.0)
RGA on scout>9cm2 17.5% 92.3% 68.8% 53.6% 2.1 (0.7~6.5)
RGA on scout>10cm2 17.5% 90.9% 58.8% 49.0% 2.1 (0.7~6.5)

RGV, rectal gas volume on CT; MRGTA, maximal rectal gas transaxial area on CT; RGA on scout, area of rectal gas on the 2-dimensional abdominal film (scout); PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; OR, odd ratio; CI, confidence interval

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure