Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017 Aug;56(8):941–951. doi: 10.1007/s40262-016-0486-0

Table 2.

Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates for the final population model.

Final Model Bootstrap (n=1,000)
Model parametera Symbol Point Estimate RSE (%) 2.5% Median 97.5%
V1 (L/kg) θV1 0.879 11.2 0.607 0.786 0.969
CL (L/h/kg0.75) θCL 0.115 5.5 0.108 0.119 0.131
V2 (xV1) θV2 0.542 32.7 0.452 0.737 1.250
Q (L/h/kg0.75) θQ 1.450 50.8 1.100 2.520 4.981
Exponent for (Age/4.7 yr) on CL θCL-AGEY 0.133 33.2 0.024 0.094 0.188
Between-Subject Variability (CV%)b
ηV1 ω2V1 47% 37% 50% 60% 75%
ηCL ω2CL 40% 18% 75% 81% 86%
ηV2 ω2V2 57% 91% 17% 48% 85%
Residual variance (WSV) (CV%)c
ERR, STUDY=1 σ2 STUDY1 33% 66% 31% 42% 61%
ERR, STUDY=2 σ2 STUDY2 22% 82% 18% 29% 51%
Weighting Exponent θPOWER 1.290 13.9 0.956 1.170 1.340

V1: central compartment volume; CL: clearance; V2: peripheral compartment volume; Q: intercompartmental clearance; RSE: relative standard error of estimate.

a

V1 (L)=0.879*WT; CL (L/h)=0.115*WT0.75*(AGE/4.7)0.133; V2 (L)=0.542*V1; Q (L/h) = 1.45*WT0.75.

b

The covariance (cov) between etas for V1 and CL (covV1,CL), V1 and V2 (covV1,V2), and CL and V2 (covCL,V2) were 0.163, −0.159, and 0.0348, respectively.

c

The relationship between observations and individual predictions was described according to the following relationship: Y=IPRED+ERR(1)*(θSTUDY1*(2-STUDY)+θSTUDY2*(STUDY-1))*(IPRED**θPOWER), where IPRED represents the individual prediction; θSTUDY1 and θSTUDY2 are the residual error terms for the Status 1 and Status 2 trials, respectively; ERR(1) was fixed to unity; and the individual predictions were raised to a power exponent denoted as θPOWER.