Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 7;3(6):e00315. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00315

Table 2.

Multinomial model associations between dietary tertiles and diabetes category.

Diabetes
IFG


RR


RR
b p Est L U b p Est L U
Unadjusted
(Intercept) -4.38 < 0.01* 0.01 0 0.12 -1.16 < 0.01* 0.31 0.14 0.68
Prudent (center) 0.17 0.83 1.19 0.24 5.85 -0.02 0.97 0.98 0.39 2.49
Prudent (high) 0.88 0.23 2.4 0.58 9.91 -0.78 0.18 0.46 0.15 1.43
Western (center) 0.58 0.64 1.78 0.16 20.26 -1.12 0.04* 0.33 0.11 0.97
Western (high) 2.65 0.01* 14.16 1.77 113.02 -0.34 0.49 0.71 0.27 1.86
Adjusted
(Intercept) -27.25 0 0 0 0 3.47 0 32.06 31.06 33.08
Prudent (center) 0.08 0.93 1.08 0.2 5.88 -0.27 0.6 0.76 0.28 2.09
Prudent (high) 0.93 0.25 2.55 0.52 12.38 -1.16 0.07 0.31 0.09 1.09
Western (center) 0.23 0.85 1.26 0.1 15.25 -1.38 0.02* 0.25 0.08 0.82
Western (high) 2.49 0.02* 12.08 1.37 106.65 -0.87 0.16 0.42 0.12 1.43
Age 0.37 0 1.45 1.19 1.78 0 0.95 1 0.85 1.18
Gender (female) -0.24 0.78 0.79 0.15 4.13 0.03 0.96 1.03 0.31 3.47
Height 0 0.91 1 0.93 1.07 -0.03 0.37 0.97 0.92 1.03
Energy Intake 0.23 0.49 1.25 0.66 2.39 0.49 0.08 1.63 0.95 2.81

RR = Risk Ratio, L and U refer to corresponding 95% upper and lower confidence intervals.* indicates significance at α < 0.05.