Table 2.
Multinomial model associations between dietary tertiles and diabetes category.
| Diabetes |
IFG |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RR |
RR |
||||||||||
| b | p | Est | L | U | b | p | Est | L | U | ||
| Unadjusted | |||||||||||
| (Intercept) | -4.38 | < 0.01* | 0.01 | 0 | 0.12 | -1.16 | < 0.01* | 0.31 | 0.14 | 0.68 | |
| Prudent (center) | 0.17 | 0.83 | 1.19 | 0.24 | 5.85 | -0.02 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.39 | 2.49 | |
| Prudent (high) | 0.88 | 0.23 | 2.4 | 0.58 | 9.91 | -0.78 | 0.18 | 0.46 | 0.15 | 1.43 | |
| Western (center) | 0.58 | 0.64 | 1.78 | 0.16 | 20.26 | -1.12 | 0.04* | 0.33 | 0.11 | 0.97 | |
| Western (high) | 2.65 | 0.01* | 14.16 | 1.77 | 113.02 | -0.34 | 0.49 | 0.71 | 0.27 | 1.86 | |
| Adjusted | |||||||||||
| (Intercept) | -27.25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.47 | 0 | 32.06 | 31.06 | 33.08 | |
| Prudent (center) | 0.08 | 0.93 | 1.08 | 0.2 | 5.88 | -0.27 | 0.6 | 0.76 | 0.28 | 2.09 | |
| Prudent (high) | 0.93 | 0.25 | 2.55 | 0.52 | 12.38 | -1.16 | 0.07 | 0.31 | 0.09 | 1.09 | |
| Western (center) | 0.23 | 0.85 | 1.26 | 0.1 | 15.25 | -1.38 | 0.02* | 0.25 | 0.08 | 0.82 | |
| Western (high) | 2.49 | 0.02* | 12.08 | 1.37 | 106.65 | -0.87 | 0.16 | 0.42 | 0.12 | 1.43 | |
| Age | 0.37 | 0 | 1.45 | 1.19 | 1.78 | 0 | 0.95 | 1 | 0.85 | 1.18 | |
| Gender (female) | -0.24 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.15 | 4.13 | 0.03 | 0.96 | 1.03 | 0.31 | 3.47 | |
| Height | 0 | 0.91 | 1 | 0.93 | 1.07 | -0.03 | 0.37 | 0.97 | 0.92 | 1.03 | |
| Energy Intake | 0.23 | 0.49 | 1.25 | 0.66 | 2.39 | 0.49 | 0.08 | 1.63 | 0.95 | 2.81 | |
RR = Risk Ratio, L and U refer to corresponding 95% upper and lower confidence intervals.* indicates significance at α < 0.05.