Skip to main content
. 2017 May 21;19(5):e179. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7290

Table 5.

Intervention characteristics.

Study Mode of delivery Recommended frequency Recommended duration of visit Interactive element Tailoring

Intervention


Duration



Attrition rateg
Chiauzzi et al [29] Website 2 times/week for 4 weeks, then unlimited <20 min/session Log of activities and content viewed during sessions Yes
Matched patient characteristics to educational content, articles, and interactive tools
4 week intervention period, access for 6 months



Attrition rate:
6 months
Ia=67/104
Cb=88/105
Simon et al [35] Website



Small information units presented in combination of text and graphics
Unlimited access but no required frequency N/Rc Simulated dialogue between user and system
Text or graphics varied based on needs of users
Yes
Ottawa Decision Support Framework
Tailoring based on ≥4 tailoring concepts, including patient characteristics and preferences
One-time use required, access for 3 months



Attrition rate:
Post-use
Ia=147/691
Cb=195/652


3 months
Ia=40/691
Cb=25/652
Carpenter et al [28] Website
Text and graphic with audio narration
Animation used in educational material
Two times/week, email reminders 1-1.5 hour/log-in Reflective and interactive exercises No




3-week intervention period



Attrition rate:
3 weeks
Ia=63/70
Cb=68/71
Krein et al [33]
Krein et al[34]d
Website
Graphical and written feedback
Motivational messages
Weekly news updates
Unlimited access with weekly reminders to upload data N/Rc Pedometer data, used to create weekly PAegoals and track progress
Targeted messages
Discussion on Web-based forum with peers and health personnel
Yes
Genderf
Written and graphical information as targeted messagesf
12-month intervention period



Attrition rate:
12 months
Ia=102/111
Cb=105/118
Irvine et al [32] Web app, accessible from Internet and mobile
Gain-framed text and video messages
Unlimited access, weekly reminders to visit app N/Rc Pain and PAeself-monitoring tool
Journal-keeping function
7- and 30-day graphs of pain
Yes
Job-type assessed by questionnaires
8-week intervention period, access for 16 weeks



Attrition rate:
8 weeks
Ia=192/199
Cb=197/199
Weymann et al [37]
Dirmaier et al [30]d

Website

Unlimited access, designed to be used in 1 sitting N/Rc Simulated dialogue between user and system



User-control to navigate site by replying to at least 3 options after each text passage
Yes



Avoidance Endurance Model
Health literacyf
Motivational Interviewing
Tunnelled design developed
3-month intervention period



Attrition rate:
3 months
Ia=96/190
Cb=106/188

Geraghty et al [31]d Website One session/week N/Rc User selects PAe, system generates activity goals
User may navigate the content as they find best
Yes
Extent of pain obstructing daily activities
3-month intervention period
Valenzuela-Pascual et al [36]d Website
Changing delivery formats
Video, 2-3D animation
Unlimited access N/Rc N/Rc
(content not yet developed)
Yes
(content not yet developed)

2-week intervention period
Amorim et al [27]d App, accessed via computer or smartphone Unlimited access, no recommendations on frequency or duration N/Rc User reports PAelevels, pain intensity, and disability
User receives encouragement based on PAelevel
No




6-month intervention period

aC: control group.

bI: intervention group.

cN/R: not reported.

dProtocol paper, no data available.

ePA: physical activity.

fInformation given in the protocol but not stated in the RCT report.

gAttrition rates reported as number of completed cases in relation to the total number of participants randomized to the group.