Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 12;8:279. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00279

Table 1.

fMRI BOLD response for idalopirdine compared to vehicle following a single administration.

Vehicle vs. Idalopiridine, postive BOLD volume of activation
15–25 min post-treatment 25–35 min post-treatment 35–45 min post-treatment
Brain area Veh I P-val Brain area Veh I P-val Brain area Veh I P-val
Reuniens nucleus 0 2 0.073 Ventral pallidum 0 5 0.022 Ventral pallidum 0 8 0.006
Ventral pallidum 0 3 0.073 Magnocellular preoptic nucleus 0 1 0.026 Accumbens shell 0 10 0.008
Magnocellular preoptic nucleus 0 0 0.082 Secondary somatosensory ctx 4 32 0.056 Diagonal band of Broca 0 7 0.008
Medial pretectal area 0 0 0.082 Accumbens shell 0 6 0.069 Medial preoptic area 1 8 0.013
Substantia innominata 0 0 0.082 Diagonal band of Broca 0 4 0.092 Infralimbic ctx 0 14 0.015
Accumbens shell 0 4 0.102 Caudal piriform ctx 0 23 0.097 Substantia nigra reticularis 6 17 0.033
Medial septum 0 0 0.114 Supramammillary nucleus 0 1 0.111 Periaqueductal gray thalamus 24 47 0.037
Lateral preoptic area 0 3 0.137 Inferior colliculus 62 85 0.121 Magnocellular preoptic nucleus 0 1 0.042

Shown are three sets of results each representing comparisons between vehicle (Veh, n = 9) and idalopirdine (I, n = 10) treatment groups at times 15–25 (left), 25–35 (middle), and 35–45 (right) min post treatment. The probability values presented on the far-right column were derived using a Kruskall-Wallis test statistic. Lists were generated to include all areas (out of a total list of 171 areas that comprise the rat MRI atlas) that differed significantly (p < 0.05) for the epoch in which we observed the most changes (i.e., the 35–45 min epoch). Areas are rank-ordered by p-value for visualization. Areas highlighted in bold differed significantly between treatment groups. Areas listed in gray show areas that come closest to threshold for statistical significance.