Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 7;23(21):3915–3927. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i21.3915

Table 3.

Prevalence or frequency of functional gastrointestinal disorders: Abdominal pain problems in children and adolescents

Author, year, country Study design, setting Sample size (participation %) Age bracket yr Case definition Case ascertainment Score1 FGID subtype prevalence %( 95%CI)
Dyspepsia Irritable bowel Abdominal migraine Abdominal pain - NOS
Baber et al[8], 2008, United States Cross-sectional, tertiary care 548 (80.1) 8-17 Rome II Parental QPGS 5 19.6 44.0 5.7 2.7
Rome III Clinical evaluation 15.2 45.1 23.1 17.4
Medical records
Laboratory exams
Bhatia et al[6], 2016, India Cross-sectional, school-based 1200 (93.3) 10-17 Rome III Self-reported QPGS-RIII 5 2.7 1.3 1.4 0.8
Medical records
Physical examination
Caplan et al[18], 2005, Canada Cross-sectional, tertiary care 315 (NR) 4-18 Rome II Self-reported QPGS 3 p 4-9 yr = 13.5 p 4-9 yr = 22.0 p 4-9 yr = 0 p 4-9 yr = 0
Parental QPGS p 10-18 yr = 14.4 p 10-18 yr = 23.9 p 10-18 yr = 0.7 p 10-18 yr = 2.9
Clinical evaluation a 10-18 yr = 10.2 a 10-18 yr = 35.5 a 10-18 yr = 2.2 a 10-18 yr = 2.9
Cristofori et al[33], 2014, Italy Cross-sectional, tertiary care 992 (NR) 4-16 Rome III Clinical evaluation 4 25.7 34.5 0.0 39.8
Medical records
Laboratory exams
Devanarayana et al[36], 2010, Sri Lanka Cross-sectional, school-based 464 (92) 12-16 Rome II Self-reported QPGS 4 1.2 2.8 0.2 1.4
Rome III 3.5 7.0 0.2 3.0
Dong et al[37], 2005, China Cross-sectional, school-based 5403 (NR) 6-18 Rome II Self-reported standard questionnaire 6 13.2
Parental standard questionnaire
Medical records
Gijsbers et al[32], 2014, the Netherlands Cross-sectional, secondary care 220 (NR) 4-16 Rome III Clinical evaluation 3 3.6 5.0 0.0 15.0
Medical records
Laboratory exams
Gulewitsch et al[34], 2013, Germany Cross-sectional, school-based 3658 (43.1) 5-12 Rome III Parental QPGS-RIII 2 0.2 4.9 1.0 3.6
Parental CSI
Parental SDQ
Helgeland et al[35], 2009, Norway Cross-sectional, secondary care 192 (NR) 4-15 Rome III Parental QPGS-III 3 10.0 43.0 23.0 15.0
Clinical evaluation
Medical records
Physical examination
Laboratory exams
Játiva et al[30], 2016, Ecuador Cross-sectional, school-based 420 (99.3) 8-15 Rome III Self-reported QPGS-RIII 3 0.5 4.8 2.4 3.1
Parental standard questionnaire
Lewis et al[25], 2016, United States Cross-sectional, online painel community 1447 (NR) 4-18 Rome III Parental QPGS-RIII 2 0.2 2.8 9.2 11.6
PedsQL4.0
Lu et al[29], 2016, Colombia Cross-sectional, school-based 4751 (89.8) 8-18 Rome III Self-reported QPGS-RIII 3 4.8
Parental standard questionnaire
Lu et al[28], 2016, Panama Cross-sectional, school-based 436 (82.8) 8-14 Rome III Self-reported QPGS-RIII 4 0.9 (0.0-2.0) 5.6 (3.1-8.1) 1.7 (0.2-2.9) 3.7 (1.7-5.8)
Parental standard questionnaire 0.3 (0.0-0.9)
Sagawa et al[16], 2012, Japan Cross-sectional, school-based 3976 (NR) 10-17 Rome III Self-reported QPGS-RIII 6 0.9 5.9 1.8 4.2
Self-reported PedsQL4.0
Clinical evaluation
Saps et al[23], 2012, United States Cross-sectional, Community 984 (25) 4-18 Rome III Parental QPGS-III 2 8.1
Saps et al[26], 2014, Colombia Cross-sectional, school-based 488 (83.2) 10.0 (mean age) Rome III Self-reported QPGS-RIII 4 1.7 (0.8-3.9) 5.4 (3.9-8.8) 1.0 (0.3-2.8) 2.7 (1.6-5.2)
Parental standard questionnaire 0.3 (0.0-1.7)
Schurman et al[21], 2005, United States Cross-sectional, tertiary care 205 (75) 8-18 Rome II Self-reported QPGS 3 p = 47 p = 20; p < 10 p < 10
Parental QPGS c/a = 35 c/a = 30; c/a < 10; c/a < 10
Clinical evaluation ph = 57 ph = 12 ph < 10 ph < 10
Uc et al[22], 2006, United States Cross-sectional, primary care 243 (100) 4-17 Rome II Parental QPGS 4 0.8 0.0 0.4 0.4
Clinical evaluation
Udoh et al[41], 2016, Nigeria Cross-sectional, school-based 856 (NR) 10-18 Rome III Self-reported QPGS-RIII 4 0.4 5.6 1.8 2.6
Standard questionnaires
Walker et al[20], 2004, United States Cross-sectional, tertiary care 114 (NR) 4-17 Rome II Parental QPGS 3 15.9 44.9 4.7 7.5
Clinical evaluation
Parental standard interview
Medical records
Physical examination
Laboratory exams
Yamamoto et al[40], 2015, Japan Cross-sectional, school-based 99416 (92.2) 12-18 Rome III Self-reported standard questionnaire 6 18.6 (17.9-19.2)
Zablah et al[27], 2015, El Salvador Cross-sectional, school-based 434 (NR) 8-15 Rome III Self-reported QPGS-RIII 3 1.7 3.7 0.7 3.0
Parental standard questionnaire
Zhou et al[38], 2011, China Cross-sectional, school-based 3671 (NR) 12-18 Rome III Self-reported standard questionnaire 5 19.8 (18.6-21.1)
1

Score: Methodological strength of study (maximum 8) by Loney’s criteria; NR: Not reported; w: With; p: Parents; c: Children; a: Adolescents; ph: Physician; QPGS-RIII: Questionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms - Rome III; QPGS: Questionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms - Rome II; PedsQL4.0 Pediatric Quality of Life version Inventory 4.0CSI: Children’s Somatization Inventory; SDQ: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.