Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 7;23(21):3915–3927. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i21.3915

Table 4.

Prevalence or frequency of functional gastrointestinal disorders: Defecations problems in children and adolescents

Author, year, country Study design, setting Sample size (participation %) Age bracket yr Case definition Case ascertainment Score1 FGID subtype prevalence % (95%CI)
Constipation Nonretentive fecal incontinence
Bhatia et al[6], 2016, India Cross-sectional, school-based 1200 (93.3) 10-17 Rome III Self-reported QPGS-RIII 5 0.5 0.4
Medical records
Physical examination
Burgers et al[31], 2012, Netherlands Cross-sectional (retrospective), tertiary care 176 (NR) 6-18 Rome II Clinical evaluation 3 5.7
Rome III Medical records 86.9
Physical examination
Caplan et al[18], 2005, Canada Cross-sectional, tertiary care 315 (NR) 4-18 Rome II Self-reported QPGS 3 p 4-9 yr = 19.2 p 4-9 yr = 0.6
Parental QPGS p 10-18 yr = 13.8 p 10-18 yr = 0.7
Clinical evaluation c/a 10-18 yr = 15.2 c/a 10-18 yr = 0.7
Devanarayana et al[36], 2010, Sri Lanka Cross-sectional, school-based 464 (92) 12-16 Rome II Self-reported QPGS 4 1.4 0.2
Rome III 4.2 0.2
Helgeland et al[35], 2009, Norway Cross-sectional, tertiary care 192 (NR) 4-15 Rome III Parental QPGS-III 3 6.0
Clinical evaluation
Medical records
Physical examination
Laboratory exams
Játiva et al[30], 2016, Ecuador Cross-sectional, school-based 420 (99.3) 8-15 Rome III Self-reported QPGS-RIII 3 11.8 0.2
Parental standard questionnaire
Lewis et al[25], 2016, United States Cross-sectional, online painel community 1447 (NR) 4-18 Rome III Parental QPGS-RIII 2 12.9 1.8
PedsQL4.0
Lu et al[29], 2016, Colombia Cross-sectional, school-based 4751 (89.8) 8-18 Rome III Self-reported QPGS-RIII 3 12.7
Parental standard questionnaire
Lu et al[28], 2016, Panama Cross-sectional, school-based 436 (82.8) 8-14 Rome III Rome III 4 15.9 (11.9-19.9) 0 (0.0-0.0)
Self-reported QPGS-RIII
Parental standard questionnaire
Rajindrajith et al[39], 2013, Sri Lanka Cross-sectional, school-based 1855 (96.7) 13-18 Rome III Self-reported QPGS-RIII 5 7.7
Self-reported PedsQL4.0
Sagawa et al[16], 2012, Japan Cross-sectional, school-based 3976 (NR) 10-17 Rome III Rome III 6 0.3 0.2
Self-reported QPGS-RIII
Self-reported PedsQL4.0
Clinical evaluation
Saps et al[26], 2014, Colombia Cross-sectional, school-based 488 (83.2) 10.0 (mean age) Rome III Self-reported QPGS-RIII 4 14.0 (12.0-19.3) 1.5 (0.7-3.6)
Parental standard questionnaire
Uc et al[22], 2006, United States Cross-sectional, primary care 243 (100) 4-17 Rome II Parental QPGS 4 16.1 0.4
Clinical evaluation
Zablah et al[27], 2015, El Salvador Cross-sectional, school-based 434 (NR) 8-15 Rome III Self-reported QPGS-RIII 3 10.0 0.0
Parental standard questionnaire
Zhou et al[38], 2011, China Cross-sectional, school-based 3671 (NR) 12-18 Rome III Self-reported standard questionnaire 5 24.9 (23.5-26.3)
1

Score: Methodological strength of study (maximum 8) by Loney’s criteria. NR: Not reported; w: With; p: Parents; c: Children; a: Adolescents; ph: Physician; QPGS-RIII: Questionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms - Rome III; QPGS: Questionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms - Rome II; PedsQL4.0 Pediatric Quality of Life version Inventory 4.0.