Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 1;4(2):88–102. doi: 10.1089/soro.2016.0028

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6.

The mapping of Fx, FT, and FD is not unique for a straight, tapered whisker unless contact points with large deflections are excluded. Color scales are identical for (a) and (b). (a) These four panels show that mappings between Fx, FT, and FD and the 3D contact point location (rcp, θcp, φcp) are not unique when large angle deflections are included. The first panel shows all 3D contact point locations for a straight, tapered whisker. The whisker is depicted as a tapered, black line, and the gray volume shows all the 3D contact point locations that the whisker was able to reach. Panels 2–4 show the mapping between Fx, FT, and FD and rcp, θcp, and φcp when all these contact points are included. The panels are color coded for rcp, θcp, and φcp, respectively. As in Figure 5, the data points that compose the mappings for all three variables are identical, but their shape appears different because they are constructed of surfaces that slice through the solid differently. The inset to the plot for rcp shows the mapping projected into the Fx, FT plane to reveal that the monochromatic surfaces overlap. Overlap is also clearly visible in the mappings for θcp, and φcp, as seen in the blue appearing to penetrate the yellow. These regions of overlap indicate that the mapping is nonunique and can be more clearly visualized in Supplementary Video S4. (b) These four panels show that mappings between Fx, FT, and FD and the 3D contact point location (rcp, θcp, φcp) become unique when large angle deflections are excluded. The first panel is identical to the first panel in (a), except that the contact points classified as large deflections are plotted as red dots. Panels 2–4 show the mapping between Fx, FT, and FD and rcp, θcp, and φcp when the red contact points involving large angle deflections are excluded. The monochromatic surfaces no longer overlap, so the mapping is unique. Supplementary Video S4 shows these mappings rotating in 3D.