Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Sports Med. 2016 May 9;44(7):1671–1679. doi: 10.1177/0363546516644218

Table 4.

Significant Odds Ratios (95% CI) for Secondary Variables in Model

Comparison Worse Outcome Marx KOOS IKDC WOMAC
Symptoms Pain ADL Sports/Rec QoL Stiffness Pain ADL
Baseline Outcome Score lower T0 score 5.79 (4.01–8.35) p<0.0001 3.86 (3.09–4.82) p<0.0001 3.81 (3.05–4.76) p<0.0001 5.09 (3.81–6.81) p<0.0001 2.97 (2.42–3.63) p<0.0001 2.15 (1.78–2.59) p<0.0001 3.06 (2.50–3.74) p<0.0001 4.34 (3.39–5.56) p<0.0001 4.02 (3.03–5.34) p<0.0001 5.09 (3.81–6.81) p<0.0001
Patient Demographics
 Age older age 2.17 (1.41–3.23) p<0.0001
 Gender male vs. female females 1.79 (1.39–2.33) p<0.0001 1.64 (1.25–2.13) p=0.0002
 Smoking status never vs. current current smoker 1.72 (1.10–2.70) p=0.018 1.75 (1.14–2.70) p=0.012
 Baseline Activity Level lower Marx score 5.79 (4.01–8.35) p<0.0001 1.63 (1.13–2.35) p=0.007 1.81 (1.26–2.59) p=0.001 2.00 (1.40–2.85) p=0.0001 2.21 (1.55–3.15) p<0.0001 1.63 (1.13–2.35) p=0.007
Previous Surgical Information
 Revision number more revisions 1.69 (1.09–2.63) p=0.019
 Time since last ACLR (yrs) less time since last ACLR 1.67 (1.14–2.45) p=0.0001 1.93 (1.32–2.83) p=0.0001 1.87 (1.25–2.78) p<0.0001 2.03 (1.38–2.99) p<0.0001 1.84 (1.25–2.72) p=0.0003 1.92 (1.30–2.82) p=0.010 1.77 (1.19–2.63) p=0.0003 1.72 (1.14–2.58) p=0.001 1.87 (1.25–2.78) p<0.0001
 Previous ACLR on contra knee no vs. yes yes 1.49 (1.01–2.22) p=0.047 1.49 (1.02–2.17) p=0.037

Key: An empty cell indicates that the particular knee rating at the top of the column was not signficantly affected by meniscal and articular surface conditions.