Skip to main content
. 2017 May 12;7(2):326–338. doi: 10.1177/2045893217706357

Table 1.

Intra-class PAH medication transitions: infused prostacyclin analogue to another infused prostacyclin analogue.

No. Original drug Drug transitioned to Publication year/ Authors Study design PAH patients Time Outcome (transition success) Comments
Prospective
1 IV epoprostenol SQ treprostinil 2007 / Rubenfire et al.12 Prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial 22 8 weeks Successful in 13/14 patients randomized to transition to SQ treprostinil Patients had stable WHO FC II or III disease 6MWD worsened by 35 m after transition to SQ treprostinil
2 IV epoprostenol IV treprostinil 2005 / Gomberg- Maitland et al.27 Prospective open-label 31 3 months Successful in 27/31 patients WHO FC, 6MWD were unchanged Hemodynamics worse
3 IV epoprostenol IV treprostinil 2007 / Sitbon et al.28 Prospective open-label 12 (NYHA class I or II) 3 months Successful in 12/12 patients Epoprostenol dose 28 ± 14 ng/kg/min Treprostinil dose 62 ± 30 ng/kg/min Fewer adverse events and all remained on treprostinil
4 IV epoprostenol IV treprostinil 2013 / Benza et al.15 Prospective open-label 31 transition patients (out of total of 47 patients reported, 16 of which are de novo) 11 months Successful transition (defined as freedom from death, lung transplantation, atrial septostomy, or discontinuation of IV treprostinil) in 77% of transition patients No change in exercise capacity, WHO FC or hemodynamics at 11 months Two transition patients died and six discontinued the study due to adverse events
5 IV epoprostenol IV treprostinil 2013 / Minai et al.29 Prospective open-label 10 8 weeks Successful in 10/10 patients No change in 6MWD; no worsening WHO FC; improved QOL and satisfaction, less time on drug prep activities
6 IV epoprostenol IV thermostable epoprostenol 2013 / Tamura et al.30 Prospective open-label 8 12 weeks Successful in 8/8 patients No safety events or change in hemodynamics, improved satisfaction scores
7 IV epoprostenol IV thermostable epoprostenol 2014 / Sitbon et al.31 Prospective open-label 41 3 months Successful in 37/41 patients TSQM scores showed an improvement in treatment convenience at 3 months
8 IV epoprostenol IV thermostable epoprostenol 2015 / Provencher el al.32 Prospective open-label 16 4 weeks Successful in 16/16 patients No change in SF-36 HRQoL, WHO FC, 6MWD, NT-proBNP Most patients preferred the thermostable product
9 IV epoprostenol IV thermostable epoprostenol 2015 / Frantz et al.14 Prospective open-label registry 189 transition patients (out of a total cohort of 336 patients) 12 months Successful in 132/189 PAH transition patients Freedom from hospitalization: 57.1 ± 3.7%; 1-year survival: 87.7 ± 2.5%
Retrospective
10 IV epoprostenol SQ treprostinil 2002 / Vachiéry et al.33 Retrospective 8 4–11 months Successful in 7/8 patients Transition achieved in 21–96 h, with no major adverse effects or worsening in clinical status All patients reported improved comfort at follow-up
11 SQ treprostinil IV treprostinil or IV epoprostenol 2014 / Alkukhun et al.34 Retrospective 9 (7 with PAH, 2 with CTEPH) 12 months Successful in 8/9 patients Reasons for SQ to IV switch were site pain (n = 6), major surgery (n = 2) and septic shock (n = 1) SQ treprostinil to IV treprostinil: dose = 84.9 to 70.8 ng/kg/min SQ treprostinil to IV epoprostenol: dose = 24.5 to 13.3 ng/kg/min

6MWD, 6-minute walk distance; FC, functional class; HRQoL, health-related quality of life; IV, intravenous; mPAP, mean pulmonary artery pressure; N/A, not applicable; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide; NYHA, New York Heart Association; QOL, quality of life; SF-36, short form (36) health survey; SQ, subcutaneous; TSQM, treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication; WHO, World Health Organization.