Skip to main content
. 2017;24(1):44–50. doi: 10.6001/actamedica.v24i1.3462

Table 1.

Prostate cancer distribution according to the Gleason score and the PI-RADS v1 score (based on 2012 ESUR recommendations)

Gleason score
6 (3+3)
Gleason score
7 (3+4)
Gleason score
7 (4+3)
Gleason score
8 (4+4)
Gleason score
9 (4+5)
Gleason
9 (5+4)
PI-RADS 1 8 (8.79%)
<0.5 cm3 – 8
≥0.5 cm3 – 0
1 (1.10%)
<0.5 cm3 – 1
≥0.5 cm3 – 0
PI-RADS 2 8 (8.79%)
<0.5 cm3 – 6
≥0.5 cm3 – 2
3 (3.30%)
<0.5 cm3 – 2
≥0.5 cm3 – 1
PI-RADS 3 27 (29.67%)
<0.5 cm3 – 16
≥0.5 cm3 – 11
3 (3.30%)
<0.5 cm3 – 1
≥0.5 cm3 – 2
2 (2.20%)
<0.5 cm3 – 2
≥0.5 cm3 – 0
4 (4.40%)
<0.5 cm3 – 3
≥0.5 cm3 – 1
1 (1.10%)
<0.5 cm3 – 1
≥0.5 cm3 – 0
PI-RADS 4 13 (14.29%)
<0.5 cm3 – 9
≥0.5 cm3 – 4
4 (4.40%)
<0.5 cm3 – 0
≥0.5 cm3 – 4
1 (1.10%)
<0.5 cm3 – 0
≥0.5 cm3 – 1
1 (1.10%)
<0.5 cm3 – 0
≥0.5 cm3 – 1
1 (1.10%)
<0.5 cm3 – 1
≥0.5 cm3 – 0
1 (1.10%)
<0.5 cm3 – 1
≥0.5 cm3 – 0
PI-RADS 5 4 (4.40%)
<0.5 cm3 – 2
≥0.5 cm3 – 2
4 (4.40%)
<0.5 cm3 – 0
≥0.5 cm3 – 4
4 (4.40%)
<0.5 cm3 – 1
≥0.5 cm3 – 3
1 (1.10%)
<0.5 cm3 – 0
≥0.5 cm3 – 1