Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 12.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Intern Med. 2010 May 18;152(10):621–629. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-10-201005180-00002

Table 3.

ICERs for Each Strategy, by Age and Previous Fracture Status*

Age, y ICER, by Previous Fracture, $/QALY
No Previous Fracture† Previous Fracture
Test and Selective Alendronate Therapy No Test and Universal Alendronate Therapy Test and Selective Alendronate Therapy No Test and Universal Alendronate Therapy
60 156 900 470 300 19 600 119 000
65   95 500 283 000    8500   72 300
70   66 800 178 700    6300   44 500
75   46 900 103 000    5700   17 300
80   37 200   61 500 Dominated      2300

ICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; QALY = quality-adjusted life-year.

*

ICER was measured by cost per QALY gained. The no test–no alendronate strategy was the reference strategy because it was the least costly, viable (nondominated) option. The strategy was considered cost-effective if its ICER was less than $100 000 per QALY gained (32, 63).

Base-case assumptions.

Universal alendronate therapy without a bone mineral density test dominated this strategy by simple dominance because it was less effective and more costly.