Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 12.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Intern Med. 2010 May 18;152(10):621–629. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-10-201005180-00002

Table 4.

ICERs for Each Strategy, by Mean BMD Before ADT and Effectiveness of Alendronate*

Mean BMD, g/cm2 Prevalence of Osteoporosis, % ICER, by Bone Loss Prevented by Alendronate, $/QALY
100% 75% 50%
Test and Selective Alendronate Therapy No Test and Universal Alendronate Therapy Test and Selective Alendronate Therapy No Test and Universal Alendronate Therapy Test and Selective Alendronate Therapy No Test and Universal Alendronate Therapy
0.8069   5 123 300 271 700 185 900 391 500 312 100 615 600
0.7540 11   66 800 178 700 112 700 257 400 205 400 417 200
0.7017 20   44 000 104 800   83 200 161 500 162 200 276 400
0.6601 30   35 200   60 500   71 700 104 200 145 600 192 600
0.6246 40 Dominated§   30 500 Dominated§   65 600 Dominated§ 136 400
0.5915 50 Dominated§   17 500 Dominated§   48 900 Dominated§ 112 300

BMD = bone mineral density; ICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; QALY quality-adjusted life-year.

*

ICER was measured by cost per QALY gained. The no test–no alendronate strategy was the reference strategy because it was the least costly, viable (nondominated) option. The strategy was considered cost-effective if its ICER was less than $100 000 per QALY gained (32, 63).

Assumed a normal distribution of BMD and 0.5915 g/cm2 as a BMD cut-off value for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Base-case assumptions.

§

Universal alendronate therapy without a BMD test dominated this strategy by simple dominance because it was less effective and more costly.