Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 12;7:3311. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03277-9

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Selective sensing of averages and variances arising from the gradient distributions by (a) symmetric-NOGSE (sNOGSE) and (c) asymmetric-NOGSE (aNOGSE) sequences. The corresponding modulation waveforms f(t) and f 0(t) are shown in panel (b) and (d) for sNOGSE and aNOGSE respectively. (e) Normalized NOGSE signals expected as a function of the delay x, where (N2)x+2y=TENOGSE=TE/2. By normalizing signals for x ≪ y and then changing x, y while keeping all other parameters – including N and TE– constant, s- and a-NOGSE sequences enable the characterization of the IGDT effects. sNOGSE’ s waveform is symmetric vs the central π refocusing pulse; all cross-terms with the internal gradients are thus zero, freeing the experiment from all internal gradients effects (panel c, black solid line). By contrast, the aNOGSE’ s waveform will be affected by both the 1st and 2nd order effects related to the internal gradient cross-terms. The legends describes the different weightings of these attenuation factors stemming from the background gradient distributions. The quantities ΔβCross and ΔβCross+ used to selectively determine the average G0 and variance (ΔG0)2 are shown with arrows, where the different signs denote the application of the external gradient G parallel and anti-parallel to the background gradient direction. Other assumptions include G0/G=0.1, ΔG02/G0=1 and N = 8.