Skip to main content
. 2017 May 22;114(23):6074–6079. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1615109114

Table S7.

Results from ABC-RF model selection, ran under eight different combinations of demographic parameters

Ancestral Ne Bottleneck Introgression Choice 1 Posterior probability ± SD Prior error ± SD
Expansion Bottleneck YES 10/10 0.868 ± 0.012 0.357 ± 0.0006
Expansion Bottleneck NO 10/10 0.817 ± 0.013 0.233 ± 0.0007
Expansion Constant Ne YES 10/10 0.889 ± 0.015 0.386 ± 0.0011
Expansion Constant Ne NO 10/10 0.797 ± 0.018 0.275 ± 0.0008
Constant Ne Bottleneck YES 10/10 0.939 ± 0.012 0.356 ± 0.0005
Constant Ne Bottleneck NO 10/10 0.585 ± 0.024 0.252 ± 0.0006
Constant Ne Constant Ne YES 10/10 0.927 ± 0.010 0.354 ± 0.0001
Constant Ne Constant Ne NO 10/10 0.564 ± 0.025 0.290 ± 0.0010

Constant ancestral Ne vs. demographic expansion in the ancestral population; constant Ne vs. bottlenecks at the time of invasion, and with or without secondary introgression between the two Baltic lineages. Choice 1 represent the number of independent random forest iterations that identified model 1 as the winner.