Table 2.
Statistic results of the five-point scale concerning the interactive experience and imaging quality.
| Focus | Subject | Votes from five-point scale | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very agree | Agree | Uncertainty | Disagree | Very disagree | |||
|
Interactive experience: Mouse-based △ Gesture-based ▲ |
The operation of viewing and processing is accurate | △ | 3 | ||||
| ▲ | 3 | ||||||
| Simple and easy to use without training | △ | 2 | 1 | ||||
| ▲ | 3 | ||||||
| A good user experience similar to native application | △ | 2 | 1 | ||||
| ▲ | 2 | 1 | |||||
|
| |||||||
| Imaging quality | Slave model could meet demands of navigation | 2 | 1 | ||||
| 2D image from Master volume could provide high quality reconstruction result via utilizing the display capability of Internet terminals | 3 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Others | Latency time for final high quality images | 3 | |||||