Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 5;20(4):702–711. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016002615

Table 3.

Proportion of fish consumption by procurement source (as a percentage of total fish consumed) according to wealth group and geographic division, rural Bangladesh, October 2011–March 2012

Purchased* Own production* Fished/collected* Gifted*
Mean se Mean se Mean se Mean se
Wealth group
1 79a,b 2 4a 1 8a 1 8a 1
2 81a,b 1 5b 1 8a,b 1 5b 1
3 81a 1 6b 1 6b 1 5b 1
4 81a,b 1 8c 1 7a,b 1 4b 1
5 79b 2 13d 1 4c 1 4b 1
Geographic division
Barisal 81a,b 3 8a,b 2 7a,b 2 4a 1
Chittagong 86a 2 5a 1 3b <1 6a 1
Dhaka 80b,c 2 7a 1 6a,c 1 6a 1
Khulna 73b,d 4 13b 2 7a 1 6a 1
Rajshahi 81a,c,d 3 5a 1 7a,b 2 6a 1
Rangpur 83a,c 3 8a,b 2 4b,c 1 5a 1
Sylhet 80a,c,d 3 4a 1 11a 2 4a 1
Total 81 1 7 1 7 1 5 <1

a,b,c,dMean values within a column with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P<0·05), sections on wealth group and geographic division considered separately.

*

All fish categories include dried and fermented fish, converted to fresh weight equivalent.

Wealth group 1 represents the poorest 20 % of households and wealth group 5 represents the wealthiest 20 % of households. Means adjusted for geographic division.

Means adjusted for wealth group.