Table 2.
Results of Logistic Regression Modelsa: Categorical IADL Scoreb and Number of Diagnoses as Predictors of Adverse Events in Four Canadian Provinces
| p | O.R. | 95% CI for O.R. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Quebec (n = 602) | ||||
| IADL Dependency and Number of Diagnosis | ||||
| Constant | 0.000 | 0.037 | ||
| IADL dependency | 0.006 | |||
| IADL dependency (1) | 0.849 | 0.878 | 0.231 | 3.344 |
| IADL dependency (2) | 0.014 | 3.522 | 1.293 | 9.590 |
| Mean # diagnoses | 0.156 | |||
| Mean # diagnoses (1) | 0.332 | |||
| Mean # diagnoses (2) | 0.060 | |||
| Nova Scotia (n = 302) | ||||
| IADL Dependency and Number of Diagnosis | ||||
| Constant | 0.000 | 0.025 | ||
| IADL dependency | 0.046 | |||
| IADL dependency (1) | 0.040 | 3.309 | 1.057 | 10.354 |
| IADL dependency (2) | 0.014 | 4.407 | 1.353 | 14.351 |
| Mean # diagnoses | 0.016 | |||
| Mean # diagnoses (1) | 0.126 | 2.052 | 0.817 | 5.149 |
| Mean # diagnoses (2) | 0.004 | 5.154 | 1.684 | 15.771 |
| Manitoba (n = 296) | ||||
| IADL Dependency and Number of Diagnosis | ||||
| Constant | 0.000 | 0.058 | ||
| IADL dependency | 0.176 | |||
| IADL dependency (1) | 0.745 | |||
| IADL dependency (2) | 0.085 | |||
| Mean # diagnoses | 0.167 | |||
| Mean # diagnoses (1) | 0.456 | |||
| Mean # diagnoses (2) | 0.428 | |||
| Ontario (n = 430) | ||||
| IADL Dependency and Number of Diagnosis | ||||
| Constant | 0.000 | 0.306 | ||
| IADL dependency | 0.000 | |||
| IADL dependency (1) | 0.000 | 0.197 | 0.088 | 0.439 |
| IADL dependency (2) | 0.001 | 0.287 | 0.136 | 0.604 |
| Mean # diagnoses | 0.112 | |||
| Mean # diagnoses (1) | 0.033 | |||
| Mean # diagnoses (2) | 0.102 | |||
aForward stepwise regression used. n.s. signifies factor was not significant
bIADL dependency score is the mean of values across 7 IADLs (meal preparation, housework, financial transactions, medication administration, telephone use, shopping, transportation), where values are: 0 = independent, 1 = completes with difficulty or requires assistance, 2 = dependent