Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 13.
Published in final edited form as: Alzheimers Dement. 2015 Jun;11(6):e1–120. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.11.001

Table 10.

Comparison of methods for increasing power in clinical trials: sample sizes per arm required to detect a 25% reduction in atrophy with 80% power, 5% significance

Outcome measure: MCI (AD)

Strategy ADAS-cog CDR-
SB
Whole
brain
Ventricular
expansion
Hippocampal
volume
Entorhinal
complex
Reference
Subject selection by multiple
  biomarker
  classifier
<40
  (<40)
[86]
No baseline adjustments, no aging 149 (81) 234 (118) 201 (88) [174]
Best baseline adjustments, no aging 122 (68) 167 (84) 178 (74)
No baseline adjustments, with aging 739 (235) 944 (254) 648 (179)
Best baseline adjustments, with aging 605 (197) 675 (181) 573 (150)
Aβ–42 <192 pg/mL 141 225 467 [160]
Normal elderly
APOE ε4 carrier 224 222 703
Normal elderly
All MCI 834 674 [172]
Screening in, best enrichment 260* 191
Screening out, best enrichment 517* 351
All MCI 978 437 181 161 186 140 [168]
APOE ε4 enrichment 774 397 135 129 133 100
Atrophy enrichment 458 191 141 121 107 67
All MCI 375 [154]
Enrichment with Aβ–42 225
QUARC entorhinal volume vs baseline 131 (44) [297]
QUARC entorhinal volume vs Aβ
  negative controls
293 (74)
*

FDG-PET.

Hippocampal volume.

11C-PiB-PET.