Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Heart Fail Clin. 2017 May 6;13(3):607–617. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2017.02.012

Table 2.

Randomized controlled trials of ET in older patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

Authors n Mean age Women (%) Duration Mode Benefits
Austin, et al [51] 200 72 34 24 weeks Aerobic resistance ↑6MWD 16%
↓NYHA Class; 16%
[QOL
Antonicelli, et al [52]* 138 77 43 6 months Cycle ↑6MWD 33%,
↑QOL, ↓BNP
Witham, et al [53] 107 80 35 24 weeks Walk/resistance No Δ 6MWD or QOL
Gottlieb, et al [48] 33 65 12 6 months Cycle/treadmill ↑Peak VO2 – 13%
↑6-min walk – 11%
No Δ – QOL
McKelvie, et al [50] 181 65 19 12 months Cycle/resistance No Δ 6MWD
↑Peak VO2 – 14%
NoΔ – QOL
Owen, et al [49] 22 81 25 12 weeks Aerobic/resistance ↑6-min walk – 11%
No Δ – QOL
Pu, et al [71] 16 77 100 10 weeks Resistance ↑Strength – 43%
↑6 min walk – 13%
No Δ – Peak VO2
Selig, et al [70] 39 65 15 3 months Resistance ↑Peak VO2 – 11%
↑FBF 20%
↑HRV
Wielenga, et al [47] 67 64 None 12 weeks Walk/cycle No Δ– Peak VO2
Willenheimer, et al [46] 54 64 28 16 weeks Cycle ↑QOL
No Δ – Peak VO2,

Abbreviations: FBF, forearm blood flow; HRV, heart rate variability; QOL, quality of life; 6MWD, 6-minute walk distance; Δ, change.

*

37% of the 373 patients had LV ejection fraction <40%