Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 13;147(16):161704. doi: 10.1063/1.4985605

TABLE I.

Computed intermolecular binding energy in the gas-phase (g) and in an 8.0 Å water shell (aq) following the thermodynamic cycle in Fig. 2.a

ID Complex ΔE(g)b ΔE(aq)
1 Acetate ⋅ methanol −19.8 −12.6
2 Acetate ⋅ water −21.1 −15.3
3 Acetate ⋅ methylamine −11.5 −0.5
4 Methylammonium ⋅ formaldehyde −19.1 −11.9
5 Methylammonium ⋅ methylamine −28.6 −22.6
6 Methylammonium ⋅ methanol −21.2 −15.5
7 Methylammonium ⋅ water −18.5 −13.8
8 Guanidinium ⋅ formaldehyde −18.1 −13.0
9 Guanidinium ⋅ methylamine −20.2 −16.0
10 Guanidinium ⋅ methanol −19.8 −15.4
11 Guanidinium ⋅ water −17.5 −14.0
12 Imidazolium ⋅ formaldehyde −16.4 −11.7
13 Imidazolium ⋅ methylamine −26.0 −23.1
14 Imidazolium ⋅ methanol −18.9 −14.0
15 Imidazolium ⋅ water −16.5 −12.1
a

Intermolecular binding energies are calculated using a combined CCSD(T)/DFT approach [see Eq. (3)]. The uncertainty is ±0.2 kcal/mol for ΔE(g) and ±1.5 kcal/mol for ΔE(aq). All energies are listed in units of kcal/mol.

b

Gas-phase interaction energies calculated at the CCSD(T)/CBS level are taken from the work of Řezáč and Hobza.29