TABLE I.
ID | Complex | b | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Acetate ⋅ methanol | −19.8 | −12.6 |
2 | Acetate ⋅ water | −21.1 | −15.3 |
3 | Acetate ⋅ methylamine | −11.5 | −0.5 |
4 | Methylammonium ⋅ formaldehyde | −19.1 | −11.9 |
5 | Methylammonium ⋅ methylamine | −28.6 | −22.6 |
6 | Methylammonium ⋅ methanol | −21.2 | −15.5 |
7 | Methylammonium ⋅ water | −18.5 | −13.8 |
8 | Guanidinium ⋅ formaldehyde | −18.1 | −13.0 |
9 | Guanidinium ⋅ methylamine | −20.2 | −16.0 |
10 | Guanidinium ⋅ methanol | −19.8 | −15.4 |
11 | Guanidinium ⋅ water | −17.5 | −14.0 |
12 | Imidazolium ⋅ formaldehyde | −16.4 | −11.7 |
13 | Imidazolium ⋅ methylamine | −26.0 | −23.1 |
14 | Imidazolium ⋅ methanol | −18.9 | −14.0 |
15 | Imidazolium ⋅ water | −16.5 | −12.1 |
Intermolecular binding energies are calculated using a combined CCSD(T)/DFT approach [see Eq. (3)]. The uncertainty is kcal/mol for and kcal/mol for . All energies are listed in units of kcal/mol.
Gas-phase interaction energies calculated at the CCSD(T)/CBS level are taken from the work of Řezáč and Hobza.29