Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 13;7:3353. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03507-0

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Ab initio and tight-binding calculations of pure and V-doped BiTeI. (a) Spin-resolved DFT-calculated (0001) surface band structure of pure BiTeI, projected onto the Te-terminated surface TL block. (b) The same as (a), but for the V-doped BiTeI case. The size of the circles reflects the module of the respective spin projection in each k-point. Note, that in (a) E F is as calculated for the H-passivated slab (see Methods Section). For the clear comparison, in (b) we shift E F to the position corresponding to the undoped case. The artificial discontinuity of the outer branches of the Rashba-split state in b (~|0.1| Å) stems from the crossing with the quantum well state localized in the subsurface TL (see Supplementary Information). (c) Tight-binding calculated surface bandstructure of V-doped BiTeI in the presence of point defect (see Text).