Skip to main content
. 2017 May 2;317(17):1774–1784. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.3091

Table 6. Unadjusted Analyses of the Total Number of General Payments per Physician in 2015.

Mean No. of Payments per Physician (95% CI) Absolute Difference, No. (95% CI) IRR (95% CI)a,b
Specialty category
Surgery 13.2 (13.0 to 13.3) −14.5 (−14.8 to −14.2) 0.90 (0.89 to 0.90)
Primary care 27.7 (27.5 to 27.9) 0 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Specialists 19.5 (19.2 to 19.8) −8.2 (−8.5 to −7.8) 0.82 (0.82 to 0.83)
Interventionalists 28.8 (28.4 to 29.2) 1.1 (0.7 to 1.6) 1.09 (1.09 to 1.10)
Sex
Men 25.3 (25.1 to 25.4) 8.2 (7.9 to 8.5) 1.20 (1.19 to 1.20)
Women 17.0 (16.8 to 17.2) 0 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Practice spending region
Low 17.0 (16.7 to 17.3) −6.3 (−6.7 to −5.9) 0.83 (0.82 to 0.84)
Average 23.3 (23.1 to 23.5) 0 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
High 24.4 (24.1 to 24.7) 1.1 (0.8 to 1.4) 1.04 (1.03 to 1.05)
Sole proprietor status
No 23.1 (22.9 to 23.2) 0 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Yes 22.5 (22.3 to 22.8) −0.6 (−0.9 to −0.2) 0.98 (0.98 to 0.99)
No response 18.7 (18.1 to 19.3) −4.4 (−5.0 to −3.7) 0.88 (0.87 to 0.89)

Abbreviation: IRR, incidence rate ratio.

a

The incidence rate ratio represents the exponent of the log of annual per-physician number of payments compared with the reference group.

b

The statistical test via generalized unadjusted negative binomial regression model was significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (P < .001, 2-sided P value; all tests).