Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 3;171(4):335–338. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.4514

Table 3. Results From 2-Part Models Estimating Health Service Utilization and Expenditures for Propensity-Score Matched Children Receiving Early Preventive Dental Care From Dentists and Primary Care Providers.

Outcome Expected Value of the Outcome β (95% CI) Effect of Early Preventive Dental Care
Logita GLM Marginal Effectb (95% CI) P Value
Preventive dental visits from dentists before age 2 y (n = 9732 child-years among 3658 matched child pairs)
Annual caries-related visits 0.22 0.71 (0.60-0.83) 0.04 (−0.02 to 0.10) 0.14 (0.11-0.16) <.001
Annual caries-related expenditures 70.50 0.72 (0.60-0.84) −0.01 (−0.13 to 0.12) 40.77 (30.48-51.07) <.001
Annual dental expenditures 127.43 1.68 (1.59-1.78) 0.03 (−0.06 to 0.13) 84.96 (72.76-97.17) <.001
Preventive dental visits from dentists before age 2 y (n = 2174 child-years among 846 matched child pairs)
Annual caries-related visits 0.15 0.06 (−0.24 to 0.36) 0.08 (−0.06 to 0.22) 0.02 (−0.03 to 0.06) .40
Annual caries-related expenditures 42.98 0.06 (−0.23 to 0.37) 0.23 (−0.03 to 0.49) 12.36 (−3.86 to 28.58) .14
Annual dental expenditures 79.58 0.19 (−0.01 to 0.38) 0.11 (−0.09 to 0.31) 17.41 (−1.22 to 36.05) .07

Abbreviation: GLM, generalized linear model.

a

Robust standard errors are used to account for matched pairs.

b

Combined marginal effect, otherwise known as the absolute difference.