Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 3;171(4):335–338. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.4514

Table 4. Among Children With Early Preventive Dental Care, Comparison of Caries-Related Visits and Expenditures for Propensity Score Matched Children Receiving 4 or More Preventive Dental Visits Before Age 2 Years vs Children With Between 1 and 3 Visits.

Outcome Expected Value of the Outcome β (95% CI) Effect of High Frequency Preventive Dental Care
Logita GLM Marginal Effectb (95% CI) P Value
≥4 Preventive dental visits from dentists before age 2 y vs 1-3 visits (n=2848 child-years among 1051 matched child pairs)
Annual caries-related visits 0.30 0.21 (0.02-0.40) 0.06 (−0.04 to 0.15) 0.07 (0.01-0.12) .01
Annual caries-related expenditures 92.27 0.21 (0.02-0.40) 0.02 (−0.15 to 0.19) 17.57 (−3.34 to 38.47) .10
≥4 Preventive dental visits from PCPs before age 2 y vs 1-3 visits (n=424 child-years among 180 matched child pairs)
Annual caries-related visits 0.17 0.31 (−0.65 to 0.57) −0.08 (−0.34 to 0.19) −0.02 (−0.12 to 0.08) .71
Annual caries-related expenditures 41.05 0.01 (−0.62 to 0.62) −0.02 (−0.42 to 0.39) −0.69 (−28.59 to 27.21) .96

Abbreviations: GLM, generalized linear model; PCP, primary care provider.

Results include estimates from care delivered by dentists and primary care providers.

a

Robust standard errors are used to account for matched pairs.

b

Combined marginal effect, otherwise known as the absolute difference.