Table 1.
Comparison between the response rate for different sensory stimuli applied to the fore– or hindlimb of a rat standing on four or two limbs. Results of Fisher Exact test, 2 × 2 contingency tables. Values in red are significant. Values in black are not significant. In parenthesis is the rate for full withdrawal for each condition.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23584.009
Table 1—source data 1. Proportion of withdrawals for different sensory stimuli applied to the fore- or hindlimb of a rat standing on four or two limbs.
Source data and Column histogram presenting the number of trials the rats responded with a full withdrawal to a stimulus. Each column presents the total number of trials. (Black: full withdrawal; Gray: no withdrawal). l-laser stimulus; s-sharp stimulus; 4-animal on all four limbs; 2-animal on two hind limbs; f -forelimb stimulation; h -hindlimb stimulation.
elife-23584-table1-data1.xlsx (20.8KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.23584.010
| Laser | Sharp | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standing on four | Standing on two | Standing on four | Standing on two | |||||||
| Forelimb (%100) |
Hindlimb (%82.8) |
Hindlimb (%48.7) |
Hindlimb+NL (%63.2) |
Forelimb (%100) |
Hindlimb (%100) |
Hindlimb (%66.7) |
Hindlimb+NL (%55) |
|||
| Laser | Standing on four |
Forelimb (%100) |
||||||||
| Hindlimb (%82.8) |
1.0 | |||||||||
| Standing on two |
Hindlimb (%48.7) |
>0.05 | <0.01 | |||||||
| Hindlimb+NL (%63.2) |
>0.2 | >0.1 | >0.4 | |||||||
| Sharp | Standing on four |
Forelimb (%100) |
1.0 | >0.1 | <0.001 | <0.05 | ||||
| Hindlimb (%100) |
1.0 | <0.05 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 1.0 | |||||
| Standing on two |
Hindlimb (%66.7) |
>0.3 | >0.1 | >0.1 | >0.7 | <0.05 | <0.001 | |||
| Hindlimb+NL (%55) |
>0.1 | >0.5 | >0.7 | >0.7 | <0.001 | <0.001 | >0.4 | |||