Skip to main content
. 2017 May 24;6:e23584. doi: 10.7554/eLife.23584

Table 2.

Comparison between the average first response latencies to different sensory stimuli applied to the fore- or hindlimb of a rat standing on four limbs. Results of two-way ANOVA analysis with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. In parenthesis is the average latency and standard deviation per each condition.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23584.012

Sharp–Forelimb
(33.2 ± 13.0 ms)
Laser—Hindlimb
(167.5 ± 43.0 ms)
Laser—Forelimb
(93.9 ± 33.0 ms)
Sharp– Hindlimb
(46.9 ± 21.0 ms)
ns <0.0001 <0.05
Sharp–Forelimb
(33.2 ± 13.0 ms)
<0.0001 <0.01
Laser– Hindlimb
(167.5 ± 43.0 ms)
<0.0001