Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 5;14(4):180–187. doi: 10.21010/ajtcam.v14i4.21

Table 1.

PC, positive control; Alp, Allupurinol; FC, chloroform fraction; FA, acetone fraction; FEA, ethyl acetate fraction;FE, ethanol fraction.

Group Dose (in mg/kg) Urine volume (ml/24 hours) Su (in mg/dL) Sc (in mg/dL) Uu (in mg/dL) Uc in (mg/dL) Fraction excretion of uric acid BUN (in mg/dL)
Control - 12.15 ± 1.22 2.91 ± 0.08 0.77 ± 0.03 30.03 ± 2.87 118.56 ± 5.48 8.25 ± 0.39 7.22 ± 0.96
PC - 18.33 ± 1.04 3.60 ± 0.35### 1.03 ± 0.02## 19.13 ± 1.93### 80.36 ± 5.92### 7.75 ± 0.48# 10.22 ± 1.28###
Alp 10 14.92 ± 1.52 2.75 ± 0.25*** 0.89 ± 0.06*** 28.52 ± 2.09*** 89.33 ± 4.62*** 10.14 ± 0.88*** 9.31 ± 1.02***
FC 120 17.66 ± 1.85** 2.52 ± 0.36* 0.72 ± 0.05* 27.24 ± 1.94* 87.25 ± 5.98** 9.03 ± 0.72** 8.45 ± 1.28**
FA 200 15.42 ± 2.33** 3.80 ± 0.15** 1.12 ± 0.07** 18.88 ± 1.38** 78.66 ± 6.04** 9.29 ± 0.36** 8.52 ± 1.16**
FEA 400 15.98 ± 1.87*** 1.40 ± 0.28*** 0.66 ± 0.02*** 33.19 ± 2.64*** 121.87 ± 7.84*** 9.38 ± 0.83*** 8.68 ± 1.08***
FE 280 16.67 ± 2.02** 2.48 ± 0.18** 0.71 ± 0.04*** 32.62 ± 2.18*** 120.29 ± 5.28*** 8.66 ± 0.51*** 8.02 ± 1.32***

Results indicating arithmatic mean ± SEM, 10 rats in each group. The statistical analysis conducted using one-way ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer test.

#

p< 0.05,

##

p<0.01 and

###

p< 0.001, compared to control group.

*

p< 0.05,

**

p<0.01 and

***

p< 0.001 compared to positive control group.