Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 5;14(4):22–30. doi: 10.21010/ajtcam.v14i4.3

Table 1.

Protective effects of the samples and positive control on Aβ25-35-induced PC12 cell damages.

Sample Concentration (μg/ml) Cell viability (%)
Control 0 100.0 ± 3.3

25-35 0.01 μM 48.6 ± 5.1#

Methanol extract 0.5 70.4 ± 6.8
2.5 114.5 ± 5.5*
5.0 163.9 ± 10.8**

Water extract 0.5 92.4 ± 8.8
2.5 106.9 ± 5.7*
5.0 122.3 ± 3.0**

95% Ethanol extract 0.5 40.9 ± 5.7
2.5 62.5 ± 6.2
5.0 71.2 ± 3.5

Ellagic acid 0.5 91.2 ± 7.8
2.5 98.4 ± 6.1*
5.0 105.1 ± 8.8*

AC-DEVD-CHO 0.5 45.5 ± 7.9
2.5 64.0 ± 5.2
5.0 94.6 ± 8.6

Curcumin 0.5 91.6 ± 3.2
2.5 93.5 ± 6.1
5.0 102.0 ± 5.4*

These data are showed as mean ± SD for 3 replicates.

#

P< 0.01 versus the control group without the addition of the sample and Aβ25-35 solutions,

*

P< 0.05;

**

P< 0.01 versus the μM Aβ25-35-treated group without the addition of the sample solution.