Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychology. 2016 Oct 24;31(1):73–83. doi: 10.1037/neu0000317

Table 4.

Variance in connectivity strength between the mPFC and each DMN seed region in sliding-window analysis

mPFC Correlation Variance BD (n = 15) HC (n = 19) p-value Effect size (Cohen’s d)
PCC .117 (.040) .177 (.071) .012* −1.04
L AG .136 (.057) .156 (.068) .333 −.319
R AG .167 (.094) .188 (.082) .253 −.238
L aMTG .210 (.122) .191 (.073) .645 .189
R aMTG .201 (.105) .182 (.068) .623 .215
L vPFC .176 (.089) .194 (.056) .419 −.242
R vPFC .179 (.097) .176 (.079) .969 .034
sMFC .162 (.084) .164 (.059) .592 −.028
L SFG .147 (.052) .156 (.074) .485 −.141
R SFG .145 (.077) .167 (.084) .228 −.273
dPFC .169 (.068) .174 (.071) .591 −.072

Data are presented as M (SD).

*

Bonferroni-corrected p ≤ 0.017

AG, angular gyrus and inferior parietal lobule; aMTG, anterior middle temporal gyrus; BD, bipolar disorder; dPFC, dorsal prefrontal cortex; HC, healthy control; L, left; mPFC, medial prefrontal cortex; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; R, right; SFG, superior frontal gyrus; sMFC, superior medial frontal cortex; vPFC, ventral prefrontal cortex