Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 14;17:314. doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-1832-y

Table 3.

Awareness and perception about CAM

Modality Year of study CAM use (Yes/no) Total (%) (Yes/no) Chi-square value (χ2) P value
Knowledge of CAM 1st 49/13 88/12 12.710 0.005*
2nd 55/10
3rd 62/1
4th 44/4
Health benefit 1st 61/1 97/3 5.549 0.136
2nd 64/1
3rd 58/5
4th 47/1
Right to choose 1st 61/1 97/3 1.076 0.783
2nd 63/2
3rd 60/3
4th 46/2
CAM together with conventional medicine 1st 55/7 82/18 4.627 0.201
2nd 52/13
3rd 52/11
4th 35/13
Quackery and charlatanism 1st 2/60 5/95 1.748 0.626
2nd 4/61
3rd 4/59
4th 1/47
Discouraging unscientific manner 1st 51/11 80/20 0.462 0.927
2nd 52/13
3rd 50/13
4th 37/11
Placebo effect 1st 14/48 18/82 2.310 0.511
2nd 9/56
3rd 13/50
4th 7/41
Stimulant of body’s natural power 1st 34/28 66/34 6.022 0.111
2nd 43/22
3rd 42/21
4th 37/11
Ideas & methods of CAM for convention medicine 1st 57/5 94/6 6.116 0.106
2nd 65/0
3rd 57/6
4th 45/3
Advising CAM by health professional 1st 61/1 93/7 4.748 0.191
2nd 61/4
3rd 56/7
4th 44/4
Threat to public health 1st 7/55 11/89 2.405 0.493
2nd 6/59
3rd 5/58
4th 8/40

*P < 0.05 was considered as significant