. 2017 Jun 13;5:e3431. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3431

Table 3. Distribution of antibiotic resistance phenotypic patterns of E. coli isolates.

Resistance pattern	Phenotypic resistance	Number of resistant E. coli isolates
		Water samples (n = 51)	Milk samples (n = 26)
I	AMC	1 (1.9%)	0 (0%)
II	AMC, AMP, CAR	2 (3.9%)	0 (0%)
III	AMC, AMP, CAR, IPM	1 (1.9%)	0 (0%)
IV	AMP	3 (5.8%)	2 (7.6%)
V	AMP, CAR	26 (50.9%)	0 (0%)
VI	AMP, CAR, CAZ, CN, CRO, CTX, CXM	2 (3.9%)	0 (0%)
VII	AMP, CAR, CAZ, CN, CRO, CTX, CXM, FEP	0 (0%)	6 (23.0%)
VIII	AMP, CAR, CAZ, CN, CRO, CTX, CXM, FEP, SCF	0 (0%)	1 (3.8%)
IX	AMP, CAR, CAZ, CN, CRO, CTX, CXM, FEP, SXT	1 (1.9%)	0 (0%)
X	AMP, CAR, CAZ, CN, CRO, CTX, CXM, SXT	1 (1.9%)	0 (0%)
XI	AMP, CAR, CIP, CN, CRO, CTX, CXM, FEP, SXT	1 (1.9%)	0 (0%)
XII	AMP, CAR, CIP, NOR	0 (0%)	7 (26.9%)
XIII	AMP, CAR, CIP, NOR, SXT	1 (1.9%)	0 (0%)
XIV	AMP, CAR, CN, CRO, CTX, CXM, SXT	1 (1.9%)	0 (0%)
XV	AMP, CAR, NOR	1 (1.9%)	0 (0%)
XVI	AMP, CAR, SXT	6 (11.7%)	7 (26.9%)
XVII	AMP, CAZ, CRO, CTX, CXM	0 (0%)	1 (3.8%)
XVIII	CN	1 (1.9%)	0 (0%)
XIX	NOR	1 (1.9%)	1 (3.8%)
XX	SXT	1 (1.9%)	1 (3.8%)
XXI	TZP	1 (1.9%)	0 (0%)

Notes.