Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jul 1;2(7):922–928. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0256

Table.

Patient Demographics and Tumor Characteristics

Characteristic Group 1: SDH-Competent GIST (n = 11) Group 2: SDHX-Mutant GIST (n = 63) Group 3: SDHC-Epimutant GIST (n = 21) All Patients (n = 95)
Age, median (range), ya 46 (30–78) 23 (7–58) 15 (8–50) 23 (7–78)
Female sex, No. (%)b 7 (64) 39 (62) 20 (95) 66 (70)
Tumor size at resection, median (range), cm 8.9 (4.7–13.5) 5.6 (1.5–21) 4.7 (2–16) 5.6 (1.5–21)
Focality, proportion (%)c,d
 Unifocal 9/10 (90) 33/55 (60) 5/18 (28) 47/83 (57)
 Multifocal 1/10 (10) 22/55 (40) 13/18 (72) 36/83 (43)
Primary location, No. (%)e
 Gastric 1 (9) 63 (100) 21 (100) 85 (89)
 Small bowel 9 (82) 0 0 9 (9)
 Abdominal 1 (9) 0 0 1 (1)
Histologic subtype, proportion (%)d,f
 Epithelioid 1/11 (9) 22/59 (37) 9/20 (45) 32/90 (36)
 Spindle 9/11 (82) 9/59 (15) 2/20 (10) 20/90 (22)
 Mixed 1/11 (9) 28/59 (47) 9/20 (45) 38/90 (42)
Metastasis at presentation, proportion (%)d
 Liver 0/10 12/58 (21) 7/19 (37) 19/87 (22)
 Peritoneum 1/10 (10) 6/58 (10) 1/19 (5) 8/87 (9)
 Lymph nodes 0/4 15/23 (65) 3/8 (38) 18/35 (51)
No liver or peritoneal metastases at presentation, proportion (%)d 9/10 (90) 41/58 (71) 12/19 (63) 62/87 (71)

Abbreviations: GIST, gastrointestinal stromal tumor; SDH, succinate dehydrogenase.

a

There was a significant difference in age between the 3 groups (P < .001). Pairwise comparisons were significantly different: group 1 vs 2, P < .001; group 1 vs 3, P < .001; group 2 vs 3, P = .002.

b

There was a significant difference in distribution of sex by group (P = .02); in pairwise comparisons, there was no difference between groups 1 and 2 (P = .91), but the distribution of sex differed significantly between group 1 and group 3 (P = .02) and between group 2 and group 3 (P = .004).

c

There was a significant difference between focality of presentation for SDH-competent and SDH-deficient GIST (P = .02).

d

The number of cases is less than the number of patients because of incomplete information.

e

There was a significant difference in the distribution of primary location of tumors. All group 2 and 3 patients had gastric tumors while 1 of 11 group 1 patients had a gastric tumor (P < .001).

f

There was a significant difference in histologic subtype among the groups. Group 1 vs 2: P < .001, group 1 vs 3: P < .001, group 2 vs 3: P = .76.