Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 8.
Published in final edited form as: Neuron. 2017 Jan 26;93(3):522–532.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.035

Figure 6. Comparison of connectivity estimates between D1- and D2-MSN stimulation network models.

Figure 6

A, Comparison of connectivity estimates between D1- and D2-MSN stimulations for the MCX network model. Statistical differences were observed in the connectivity estimates between D1- and D2-MSN stimulations. B, Comparison of connectivity estimates between D1- and D2-MSN stimulations for the SCX network model. Statisticaldifferences were observed in the connectivity estimates between D1- and D2-MSN stimulations. Error bars represent the standard error of the connectivity estimates over subjects. * indicates P < 0.05 and *** indicates P < 0.001 across subjects after applying a multiple comparison correction across a priori connections with FDR; “cts” indicates a close-to-significant difference (P < 0.10).