Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Dev. 2016 Dec 15;89(2):339–348. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12691

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics for Participants with Low and High Hurricane Sandy Exposure.

Low Exposure (n = 40) High Exposure (n = 37) χ2 or t
Demographics
 Age pre-Hurricane assessment (yrs) 9.23 (0.42) 9.14 (0.27) t = 1.00
 Age post-Hurricane assessment (yrs) 11.02 (0.78) 10.87 (0.78) t = 0.63
 Sex (% females) 52.5% 56.8% χ2 = 0.14
 Race (% Caucasians) 87.5% 78.4% χ2 = 1.14
 Parental education (% with at least one parent graduated from college) 70.0% 78.4% χ2 = 0.70
 Socioeconomic Statusa 42.47 (9.36) 46.24 (11.31) t = 2.55
Hurricane Sandy exposures 0.98 (0.80) 5.65 (2. 21) t = 156.34**
Pre-Hurricane Sandy
 LPP
  Neutral 4.47 (10.17) 5.93 (9.03) t = .44
  Pleasant 7.16 (10.21) 9.44 (8.85) t = 1.09
  Unpleasant 10.99 (10.13) 11.48 (7.35) t = 0.06
 ΔLPP
  Pleasant 2.37 (6.80) 3.51(8.02) t = 0..23
  Unpleasant 6.52 (6.50) 5.55(6.23) t = 0.45
Post-Hurricane Sandy
 LPP
  Neutral 4.39 (6.25) 4.57 (6.23) t = 0.15
  Pleasant 6.43 (5.94) 6.51 (6.69) t < .01
  Unpleasant 7.40 (7.36) 10.21 (6.42) t = 3.18
 ΔLPP
  Pleasant 2.03 (4.75) 1.94 (4.76) t < .01
  Unpleasant 3.00 (4.92) 5.64 (6.12) t = 4.38*

SDs are presented in parentheses.

p < .10

*

p < .05,

**

p < .001