Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 16.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2010 Mar;119(3):141–149. doi: 10.1177/000348941011900301

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Stimulation outcomes on aspiration (%) in patients #s 1–5 based on SLP (I, II, ORIG) information. Aspiration decreased with stimulation ON in all cases except for minor differences in patients # 1 (SLP II), # 2 (no differences for SLP II) and # 3 (SLP II). ORIG SLP data also indicate decrease (See table 5 for numbers).