Table 4.
Patient | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Symptom | SLP I | SLP II | SLP I | SLP II | SLP I | SLP II | SLP I | SLP II | SLP I | SLP II |
PPE | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 93 | 56 | 56 | 68 | 64 |
ASR | 5 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 83 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
DSR | 85 | 100 | 83 | 100 | 12 | 93 | 0 | 12 | 62 | 45 |
APS | 11 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 67 | 79 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
RPC | 12 | 100 | 8 | 57 | 33 | 99 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 30 |
RLE | 48 | 88 | 28 | 75 | 18 | 97 | 0 | 53 | 9 | 41 |
REI | 9 | 96 | 3 | 27 | 33 | 95 | 0 | 25 | 2 | 7 |
IAC | 73 | 76 | 33 | 43 | 70 | 94 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 18 |
PLV | 75 | 75 | 43 | 53 | 81 | 96 | 10 | 18 | 9 | 26 |
ADS | 22 | 46 | 3 | 35 | 13 | 44 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 9 |
VLR | 24 | 63 | 71 | 77 | 66 | 90 | 22 | 32 | 28 | 10 |
PSR | 37 | 96 | 27 | 23 | 89 | 93 | 9 | 0 | 26 | 14 |
PWR | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 25 | 21 | 2 | 0 | 23 | 7 |
CPD | 4 | 35 | 81 | 0 | ||||||
AWS | 27 | 3 | 34 | 70 | 79 | 0 | 63 | 13 | 7 |
Note: Considering also salient symptoms from ORIG SPL (not represented here), PPE amounted to 95 and 92 % for patients #s 1 and 2, but varied as 93.8 and 40 % for VLR and 93 and 40 % for PLV respectively. In patient # 1, RPC was 63 % and IAC 49 % for patient # 2. Interreliability correlations between SLPs I and II varied (%) as 99 for PPE, 59 for DSR, 98 for PLV, 76 for VLR and 77 for PSR.