. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 16.

Published in final edited form as: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2010 Mar;119(3):141–149. doi: 10.1177/000348941011900301

Table 5A.

Tally of aspiration arrests (all consistencies) over number of trials in individual (#s 1–5) patients. Top: SLP I, middle: SLP II, bottom: ORIG SLP (4). While most patients experienced aspiration rate decreases under stimulation, #s 1 and 3 had small increases according to SLP II only. Statistical significance (bold) was verified between ON and OFF except in patient # 2 and for SLP II and # 3, or when the sample was too small as in # 5, SLP I).

SLP I/Pt	1	2	3	4	5
ASP OFF	18	5	8	3	2
# Trials	22	17	6	32	5
ASP ON	20	0	1	3	0
# Trials	37	19	4	36	5
X²	p< .05	p< .02	NS	NS	NS
SLP II/Pt	1	2	3	4	5
ASP OFF	11	19	33	5	19
# Trials	11	29	27	42	70
ASP ON	25	21	46	1	0
# Trials	22	32	35	59	71
X²	p< .01	NS	NS	P< .05	p< .01
ORIG SLP/Pt	1	2
ASP OFF	16	0
# Trials	28	18
ASP ON	19	0
# Trials	39	18
X²	p< .05	p< .05