Table 3.
Variable, Coding | Unpaired Analysis
|
Paired Analysis
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | P Value | OR (95% CI) | P Value | |
Image type | ||||
| ||||
Gray-scale | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | ||
| ||||
Color | 1.0 (0.8–1.4) | .99 | 1.2 (0.9–1.6) | .82 |
| ||||
Lesion diagnosis | ||||
| ||||
Nevus | 1 [Reference] | |||
| ||||
Melanoma | 1.0 (0.7–1.3) | .98 | 1.2 (0.3–4.3) | .82 |
| ||||
BCC | 1.2 (0.9–1.6) | .31 | 0.6 (0.1–2.0) | .34 |
| ||||
SCC | 0.1 (0.1–0.1) | <.001 | 0.1 (0.02–0.4) | .002 |
| ||||
DF | 1.2 (0.8–1.7) | .40 | 0.6 (0.1–2.4) | .43 |
| ||||
SK | 0.7 (0.5–0.9) | .01 | 0.5 (0.1–1.6) | .21 |
| ||||
Hemangioma | 1.9 (1.1–3.1) | .01 | 1.3 (0.2–5.2) | .83 |
| ||||
Interaction: color by diagnosisa | ||||
| ||||
Color × nevus | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | ||
| ||||
Color × melanoma | 0.4 (0.2–0.5) | <.001 | 1.2 (0.8–1.8) | .41 |
| ||||
Color × BCC | 0.4 (0.3–0.6) | <.001 | 0.8 (0.6–1.2) | .38 |
| ||||
Color × SCC Drops out | 2.5 (1.6–3.9) | <.001 | ||
| ||||
Color × DF | 0.1 (0.1–0.2) | <.001 | 0.2 (0.1–0.3) | <.001 |
| ||||
Color × SK | 0.7 (0.5–1.1) | .13 | 0.8 (0.6–1.1) | .23 |
| ||||
Color × hemangioma | 1.7 (1.0–3.1) | .07 | 3.3 (1.9–5.6) | <.001 |
| ||||
Sex | ||||
| ||||
Female | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | ||
| ||||
Male | 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | .88 | 1.0 (0.8–1.1) | .51 |
| ||||
Age, y | ||||
| ||||
21–30 | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | ||
| ||||
31–50 | 1.4 (1.1–1.8) | .003 | 1.5 (1.3–1.8) | <.001 |
| ||||
≥51 | 1.4 (1.1–1.9) | .02 | 1.6 (1.3–1.9) | <.001 |
Abbreviations: BCC, basal cell carcinoma; DF, dermatofibroma; OR, odds ratio; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; SK, seborrheic keratosis.
The interaction term depicts the differential effect of color on the proportion of correct responses by lesion diagnosis.