Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 28;44(3):188–200. doi: 10.1159/000452107

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Automated evaluation according to AGHV standard (here: break-off during PLT, detail). Data from Hanover Medical School 2015 as an example for the function of the system. The automated evaluation does not only comprehend break-offs, but also reasons for break-offs (puncture-, citrate toxicity (anticoagulation)-, circulation-related etc.), the type of PLT procedures that were involved in the break-off (single, double or triple PLT) and a comparison between the numbers of planned blood products at start of PLT versus the numbers of blood products that had been already obtained when the PLT had to be terminated.