Table 1. Methodological quality assessment (risk of bias) of included studies by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
For each domain, either a "star" or "no star" is assigned, with a "star" indicating that study design element was considered adequate and less likely to introduce bias. A maximum of two stars can be given for Comparability. A study could receive a maximum of ten stars.
Study | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | Data analysis | Total score | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Exposed cohort | Non-exposed cohort | Ascertainment of exposure | Outcome of interest | Assessment of outcome | Length of follow-up | Adequacy offollow-up | ||||
Chee et al., 2008 | * | * | * | - | * | * | * | - | - | 6 |
Cermak et al., 2009 | - | * | * | - | ** | * | * | * | - | 7 |
Park et al., 2011 | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | * | 10 |
Kikuchi et al., 2012 | * | * | * | - | ** | * | * | * | * | 9 |
Komrokji et al., 2012 | * | * | * | - | * | * | - | * | * | 7 |
Li et al., 2013 | * | * | * | - | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |