Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 16;12(6):e0179465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179465

Table 2. Measurement of cuticle thickness and the ratio of cuticle zone thickness to total cuticle thickness of phoretic and parasitic stage Parasitaphelenchinae species.

Species n Thickness of cuticle (nm) ± S.E. Percentage of the thickness of the cuticle zones in a form, % (range)
EPI CZ BZ
Bursaphelenchus. xylophilus 5 238.2 ± 5.2 13.0
(10.9–15.0)
34.0
(28.5–39.1)
53.0
(48.9–56.5)
B. conicaudatus 5 240.6 ± 10.6 12.3
(11.1–16.7)
34.3
(30.4–37.4)
53.4
(51.0–58.5)
B. luxuriosae (PM) 5 272.2 ± 6.9 10.0
(7.8–11.2)
40.0
(26.7–50.8)
50.0
(41.4–53.8)
B. luxuriosae (PF) 5 280.2 ± 14.7 11.3
(9.5–12.3)
39.1
(37.1–41.5)
49.6
(46.5–51.9)
B. rainulfi 5 203.7 ± 5.9 16.7
(14.5–18.9)
30.0
(26.9–34.7)
53.3
(46.4–58.0)
Bursaphelenchus sp. 5 247.4 ± 12.2 12.5
(10.6–16.4)
34.3
(27.1–46.3)
53.2
(43.1–62.4)
Parasitaphelenchus sp. 5 260.3 ± 15.7 8.3
(6.8–9.7)
91.7
(90.3–93.2)

PM = parasitic male; PF = parasitic female; EPI = epicuticle; CZ = cortical zone; BZ = basal zone. No significant differences were seen in cuticle thickness or the ratio between cuticle zones among species (P<0.05). Parasitaphelenchus sp. was excluded from the percentage data comparison because of its structural differences from Bursaphelenchs spp.