Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Methodology (Gott). 2016 Dec 5;12(4):107–116. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241/a000114

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Simulated coverage for 95% confidence intervals of selected methods in low measurement quality scenarios with binary outcomes. The four bars for each method, in order from top (light) to bottom (dark), represent coverage for the following four conditions: small effect size, even class sizes; small, uneven; large, even, large, uneven. Results for high measurement quality were similar. Larger effect sizes and uneven class sizes resulted in poorer coverage for uncorrected techniques. The BCH and ML methods with proportional assignment are omitted here as their coverage was very close to that of the corresponding method with modal assignment.