Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 17;18:305. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1719-4

Table 3.

Comparison of IS analysis of published data [24] for Paris (P) and London (L) samples with Ub-ISAP

Dataset Total ISs TSS-proximal Intragenic Intergenic
P-[24] 250,215 66,991 (26.77%) 108,033 (43.18%) 75,191 (30.05%)
P-Ub-ISAP 255,502 60,588 (24%) 110,101 (43%) 84,813 (33%)
L-[24] 54,424 12,538 (23.03%) 23,355 (42.91%) 18,532 (34.06%)
L-Ub-ISAP 61,067 12,269 (20%) 25,898 (42%) 22,900 (37%)