Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Sex Behav. 2016 Dec 16;47(1):95–106. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0879-z

Table 4.

Latent class model for HIV-negative/unknown (n=552) and HIV-Positive men (n=218)

Overall Condom
Users
Multiple
Prevention
Users
Viral-load
Sorters
Serosorters

Prevention Strategies N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)
HIV-Negative/Unknown 397 (71.9) 50 (9.0) 46 (8.3) 59 (10.8)

Consistent Condom Use 353 (64.0) 322 (81.0) 29 (57.5) 3 (6.2) 0 (0.0)
Strategic Positioning 147 (26.6) 70 (17.5) 45 (91.2) 20 (44.2) 12 (20.0)
Anal Sex Avoidance 274 (49.6) 188 (47.4) 50 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 36 (61.1)
Serosorting 195 (35.3) 77 (19.5) 41 (82.8) 17 (37.4) 59 (100.0)
Viral-load Sorting 55 (10.0) 0 (0.0) 23 (46.3) 32 (69.8) 0 (0.0)
Withdrawal 154 (27.9) 101 (25.5) 33 (65.5) 16 (35.9) 4 (6.6)

HIV-Positive 92 (42.3) 20 (9.2) 30 (13.8) 76 (34.8)

Consistent Condom Use 73 (33.5) 58 (62.7) 6 (31.7) 0 (0) 9 (11.7)
Strategic Positioning 78 (35.8) 18 (19.4) 15 (74.4) 12 (40.0) 33 (43.8)
Anal Sex Avoidance 78 (35.8) 38 (41.1) 18 (89.4) 9 (30.0) 13 (17.4)
Serosorting 113 (51.8) 17 (18.6) 20 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 76 (100.0)
Viral-load Sorting 85 (39.0) 0 (0.0) 20 (100.0) 30 (100.0) 35 (46.1)
Withdrawal 65 (29.8) 18 (19.5) 14 (72.1) 17 (56.7) 16 (20.6)

Bolded text indicates behaviors used by a majority of the participants belonging to each given class.