Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 19;8:1127. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01127

Table 2.

Effects of tillage regime, crop residue management, crop, and growing season on bacterial and fungal β-diversity.

Bacteria Fungi


(A) Main test F P(perm) R2 F P(perm) R2
Tillage 6.9 ∗∗∗ 7 9.7 ∗∗ 10
Residue 0.9 0.6 1 1.6 0.2 1
Crop 6.6 ∗∗∗ 7 1.4 0.2 9
Season 3.2 ∗∗∗ 10 7.5 ∗∗∗ 19
Tillageseason 1.1 0.2 3 1.1 0.1 3

(B) Pairwise test t Padjust Avg sim t Padjust Avg sim

s-CT, s-RT 1.6 ∗∗∗ 69.9 1.8 ∗∗∗ 59.9
l-CT, l-RT 1.6 ∗∗∗ 67.0 2.1 ∗∗∗ 51.7
f-CT, f-RT 1.3 73.3 1.5 ∗∗ 58.2
t-CT, t-RT 1.9 ∗∗∗ 71.3 1.9 ∗∗∗ 56.4
g-CT, g-RT 1.1 0.1 69.3 1.7 ∗∗∗ 58.7

(A) Effects of main factors and their interactions as assessed by multivariate permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). Main factors represent tillage (CT, RT), residue management (R+, R-), crop (Vicia faba and Triticum aestivum), and growing season (s, seedling; l, leaf development; f, flowering; t, tillering; g, grain filling). s, l, and f correspond to early, intermediate and late stage of V. faba, and t and g correspond to early and late stage of T. aestivum. Values represent the pseudo-F ratio (F), the permutation-based level of significance [P(perm)] and the proportion of variance explained by each factor (R2). (B) Pairwise comparisons between tillage regimes over the season of the two crops. Values represent the univariate t-statistic (t), the permutation-based level of significance adjusted for multiple comparisons using false discovery rate correction according to Benjamini–Hochberg (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995) (Padjust), and the average between-group Bray–Curtis similarity (avg sim). Significant results are labeled in bold (p ≤ 0.05, ∗∗p ≤ 0.01, ∗∗∗p ≤ 0.001).